Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 25th Jan 2009 18:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 345444
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Tsk. What a lousy excuse. The spelling differences are exactly the same in Dutch, while the difference in pronunciation are much greater.
Isn't the Frisian language a sort of bridge between Dutch and English?
@Thom
Maybe you could write your articles in Frisian for the "benefit" of the spelling Nazis?
"Tsk. What a lousy excuse. The spelling differences are exactly the same in Dutch, while the difference in pronunciation are much greater.
Isn't the Frisian language a sort of bridge between Dutch and English? "
Not really, at least not in every respect.
Afrikaans is the closest thing to English you'll get, as for the syntax.
BTW, Dutch don't use "complement", except in maths and in phony (marketing) speak.
@Thom
Maybe you could write your articles in Frisian for the "benefit" of the spelling Nazis?
I kind of doubt Thom, like the vast majority of Dutch people, knows more than a few words of Frisian. The only person I know personally who speaks Frisian is an Israeli.
I'd love to see some articles in Afrikaans, though. ;-)
RE[3]: My complements
by BluenoseJake on Sun 25th Jan 2009 23:08
in reply to "RE[2]: My complements"





Member since:
2006-01-08
Tsk. What a lousy excuse. The spelling differences are exactly the same in Dutch, while the difference in pronunciation are much greater.
Edited 2009-01-25 20:31 UTC