Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 13:51 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Thread beginning with comment 354156
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by sadyc
by Soulbender on Fri 20th Mar 2009 17:50
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by sadyc"
Why not blame FORD executives for refusing to buy the information about defective cars, thereby exposing their customers to the risk?
Except that, for one reason or other, they don't know? And even if they did, who cares who's to blame? Wouldn't it be more important to save lives than play petty blame games? I presume you would gladly let people suffer and die just to point the finger at the execs?
The blame can be assessed at a later time, it won't go away just because you expose the problem. If you keep the problem secret and sell it to them silently there sure as hell won't be any blame dished out.
but I don't think anyone should work for free for closed-source, IP-paranoid company who boasts making a highly secure and usable operating system
Good job missing the point again. It's not about who is closed source and evil or has brown pants or whatever. It's about behaving responsibly and not leaving the general public exposed to danger.
He sat on the bug for a year. FOR A YEAR. Two wrongs does not make a right.
In fact, I'd say it would be extremely shortsighted to help these companies for free instead of contributing to improve FOSS alternatives.
Yes, because all software must be FOSS. It magically makes everything ok. Blah blah blah.
The whole OS matters for the exploit, and OSX is not open source.
Who cares if it's not open source? That's not the point. The point is to not expose the unknowing consumer to risks.
RE[5]: Comment by sadyc
by wannabe geek on Fri 20th Mar 2009 20:14
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by sadyc"
Except that, for one reason or other, they don't know? And even if they did, who cares who's to blame? Wouldn't it be more important to save lives than play petty blame games? I presume you would gladly let people suffer and die just to point the finger at the execs?
In the example they do know someone claims there's a problem, and they refuse to buy the details. It's easy to go like "would you let people suffer and die...?". You might as well claim that doctors should work for free, and not just doctors, but (more to the point) engineers and anyone whose work may somehow save lives or reduce human suffering.
Who cares if it's not open source? That's not the point. The point is to not expose the unknowing consumer to risks.
Look, the bottom line here is that desktop operating systems nowadays are extremely vulnerable to malware, and should never be relied upon for any kind of life-sensitive use, unless complete isolation is guaranteed. If a cobalt-60 unit is hooked to a Mac where medical students surf through porn sites, and something bad happens because of that, the last person I would blame is the guy who failed to disclose a Mac vulnerability for free.





Member since:
2006-09-27
Why not blame FORD executives for refusing to buy the information about defective cars, thereby exposing their customers to the risk?
I'm with Miller on this one, to some extent. Selling the information to criminals would be wrong, but I don't think anyone should work for free for closed-source, IP-paranoid company who boasts making a highly secure and usable operating system. In fact, I'd say it would be extremely shortsighted to help these companies for free instead of contributing to improve FOSS alternatives. Remember the exploit is not just about Webkit, not even about Safari. The whole OS matters for the exploit, and OSX is not open source.