Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Mar 2009 18:43 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y Any discussion about GNOME vs. KDE is sure to end in tears. It's basically impossible to discuss which of these two Free desktop environments is better than the other, mostly because they cater to different types of people, with different needs and expectatotions. As such, Bruce Byfield decided to look at the two platforms from a different perspective: if we consider their developmental processes, which of the two is most likely to be more successful in the coming years?
Thread beginning with comment 355858
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: There is no argument
by paws on Mon 30th Mar 2009 21:16 UTC in reply to "RE: There is no argument"
Member since:

I'd say the strongest argument for using GNOME Do on Linux and not on Windows is that it doesn't run on Windows, even if it is based on Mono.

+1 for Do, though. Killer app.

Edited 2009-03-30 21:17 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1