Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 2nd May 2009 10:23 UTC, submitted by Luis
Linux Yes boys and girls, it's Net Applications time. Sure, their figures are flawed, and sure, they're misused all over the non-scientifically educated media, but that doesn't mean they do not indicate trends. One of those trends was a slowly rising popularity of Linux, which hit 0.93% market share in August 2008, only to sink back again during the following months. Well, it's April May 2009 now, and Linux has finally crossed the 1% market share line!
E-mail Print r 13   · Read More · 111 Comment(s)
Thread beginning with comment 361423
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: OEMs
by eksasol on Sat 2nd May 2009 14:57 UTC in reply to "OEMs"
eksasol
Member since:
2009-04-05

Most people I've met who are older than me need instruction on even downloading software from the web. They are incapable of even installing something simple like firefox. I've actually shown someone at my work step by step how to download Avira Antivir when their Mcaffe subscription ran out and when they got home (after taking notes) still couldn't do it. So to expect the general public to repartition or even run a Wubi installer under Ubuntu, sadly, is too much to ask.

I help other people on computers a lot too, but I still choose to believe its not that Linux is hard to use, but Microsoft has such a large culture and people are used it. Since you say they have problem installing the software its more of a universal model than a specific OS. In a supposed example, if Linux has switched place with Microsoft, the "mass" Linux users who never used Windows in their life before could find it difficult to use. And it is with all the hidden and scattered options.

Edited 2009-05-02 15:05 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: OEMs
by tech10171968 on Sat 2nd May 2009 18:18 in reply to "RE: OEMs"
tech10171968 Member since:
2007-05-22

I help other people on computers a lot too, but I still choose to believe its not that Linux is hard to use, but Microsoft has such a large culture and people are used it. Since you say they have problem installing the software its more of a universal model than a specific OS. In a supposed example, if Linux has switched place with Microsoft, the "mass" Linux users who never used Windows in their life before could find it difficult to use. And it is with all the hidden and scattered options.

I don't know why the hell you were modded down, for this is the crux of the matter. I've heard so many people saying "...but Windows is more user-friendly easier to use...". I don't believe that for a second; Windows just seems easier because most people were raised on a steady diet of Microsoft. To these folks Linux seems awfully weird and unfamiliar, so they end up running back to the Devil they know.

If you took someone who was raised on a steady diet of Linux/Solaris/Haiku/etc, and suddenly threw him in front of a Vista machine, he'd have exactly the same complaint. Could you imagine someone saying, "... but Linux is more user-friendly and easier...".

Reply Parent Score: 7