Linked by David Adams on Tue 12th May 2009 16:43 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 363091
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-06-28
i'll start by saying that i make a point of blocking ads at home, no matter what.
when i browse from work (which is when i read osnews most often) i do not block ads completely, only pop-ups.
that being said...
it's *never* acceptable for an ad to:
- stream video (or audio of any sort) without viewer authorization. especially considering the looming threat of bandwidth caps all over the place. i realize that video-based ads really don't use *tons* of bandwidth... but, for people with low limits, every kilobyte counts. period. not to mention, it's distracting and annoying. which is sort of the point, probably.
- visually obscure the content the viewer is trying to access. if i have to click it away, i usually just leave the website.
- flash and blink, or physically move around the screen. no matter how relevant an ad is, if it's blinking, it's taking my concentration away from what i'm trying to read.
keeping it simple and relevant works wonders. right now, the unobtrusive System76 ads on this page are not bothering me at all, for example.
edit: just remembered another doozy... i really hate those ads masquerading as hyperlinks that give a little pop-up when you hover over them. so freaking annoying.
Edited 2009-05-12 18:02 UTC