Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Jul 2005 14:00 UTC, submitted by Timothy R. Butler
GNU, GPL, Open Source Tim Butler knew when he mentioned something negative about the GNU Project's General Public License (GPL), in his column on KDE last week, he would inevitably be accused of arguing the GPL was a bad license. What did not fit into that piece shall now be dealt with: is the GPL a bad license or is the issue he complained about something else?
Thread beginning with comment 3648
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
sigh.
by on Wed 13th Jul 2005 16:25 UTC

Member since:

Trust Lumbergh to come bargin in with his obsessive-compulsory anti-gpl stallman-paranoia and try to confuse things... YOUR code is ALWAYS free for YOU to release under ANY license YOU want. It's YOUR code, YOU have the copyright to it. GPL does NOT take away your copyright..

Reply Score: -1