Linked by snydeq on Mon 1st Jun 2009 16:27 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 366551
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Left hand meet right hand
by WereCatf on Mon 1st Jun 2009 21:14
in reply to "RE: Left hand meet right hand"
An arm port of Windows wont be of much use without apps to run on it.
Well, Microsoft could always integrate x86 emulation into Windows so that you could run x86 applications on ARM Windows.. You'd sacrifice helluva lot of performance then though, so it wouldn't work for any intensive applications. It would probably work for any simpler apps like f.ex. office work.
RE[3]: Left hand meet right hand
by lemur2 on Mon 1st Jun 2009 23:44
in reply to "RE[2]: Left hand meet right hand"
An arm port of Windows wont be of much use without apps to run on it. Well, Microsoft could always integrate x86 emulation into Windows so that you could run x86 applications on ARM Windows.. You'd sacrifice helluva lot of performance then though, so it wouldn't work for any intensive applications. It would probably work for any simpler apps like f.ex. office work.
ARM processors running at 1GHz in battery-powered mobile devices just don't have enough processing grunt to make such a thing practical.
Is it possible? Yes. Is it useable at al? No. Sorry.
If you want an application to work on an ARM device of this capability ... take the original source code and re-compile it for ARM. That is the ONLY practical way to run things on on an ARM device.
If you have an x86 binary-only copy of an application, you can forget about trying to run it satisfactorily on an ARM netbook.




Member since:
2009-02-25
An arm port of Windows wont be of much use without apps to run on it.