Linked by Kroc Camen on Thu 4th Jun 2009 22:34 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 367114
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-07-04
Your article was your opinion - I totally support your right both to have and voice your opinion.
As the saying goes "I may not like what you say but I'll defend your right to say it".
I don't think many people have a problem with the fact you have an opinion. I think the problem was with the emphasis - style over substance. Form over functionality.
E.g. I'm an Opera user (surprise surprise), as I write this I'm using 10 beta and I've tiled the display with your review in the left half and this comment in the right - a fantastic piece of functionality that comes as standard. Would I trade this for a "better" GUI or icon... no chance. A victory for function over form.
And that was the main issue with the review - function was relegated in favour of form.
I don't think any of us have a problem with you - never met you to have a problem. And I agree that maybe more of us need to contribute if possible.
Don't take it personally. You actually posted an article and it takes a bit of courage to put oneself up to be knocked down. Kudos for that.
Edited 2009-06-05 09:27 UTC