Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 23rd Jun 2009 21:40 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 369981
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-20
I'm not sure I understand the claims in the image on the posted site. If you zoom in on the "blurry" macintosh "i" and the "crisp" windows "i", they are identical. Down to the color and pixels.
The lighter non-bold windows font rendering in the title (ostensibly to fit to the pixel grid) is also the same width (2px) as the mac version. The colors are just lighter on windows.
The "rounded g descender" also isn't rounded any differently from the windows version (the latter simply has more AA fuzz around it).
So, I'm not sure how much faith I'd put in the rest of that article...