Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Jul 2009 20:10 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 375497
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I haven't used KDE in awhile but maybe try using Arora (QT based webkit browser) instead of Konqurer.
Arora is the default browser for Kubuntu Karmic instead of Konqueror. It is fairly lightweight and snappy, and it uses webkit as the rendering engine, but it doesn't have anywhere near the extendability of Firefox.
Firefox is however a GTK+ application. This means the dialog boxes and things like favourite shortcuts are all not integrated.
It is very frustrating. Why can't KDE users have a browser that uses: a Qt front-end GUI, XULrunner for programmability and extensibility, and webkit and squirrelfox (i.e. Google Chrome) as the backend? The best of all worlds. While we are at it, lets have a better-integrated version of gnash and openjdk as well. It is all open source, and isn't open source supposed to be a meritocracy?
Why can't KDE users have a browser that uses: a Qt front-end GUI, XULrunner for programmability and extensibility, and webkit and squirrelfox (i.e. Google Chrome) as the backend?
You can achieve some of that ghetto-style with kgtk, an LD_PRELOAD hack that replaces the GTK filepicker (the most aggravating part of GTK) with the default KDE one. Been using it for years, though often it involves editing the launcher script for Firefox, which likes to unset LD_PRELOAD. It's just a one-line comment deal.




Member since:
2006-01-10
I haven't used KDE in awhile but maybe try using Arora (QT based webkit browser) instead of Konqurer.