Linked by Alfonso Martinez on Tue 20th Oct 2009 22:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 390271
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Strange, I clearly remember Be advertising dramatic performance improvements with each additional processor added to a machine.
That was true, but it mainly applied to tasks that were CPU intensive and performed using BeOS-native, multi-threaded applications. It makes less difference in terms of basic, day-to-day tasks - it's not going to reduce boot time, Firefox isn't going to start any faster, etc.
Also, keep in mind that 1Ghz CPUs were just starting to become available around the time of the last BeOS release. So, for most of Be's existence, running BeOS on dual processors meant dual 66Mhz PPCs up to dual 1Ghz P3s. For most uses, going from a single to a dual P3 450 setup resulted in much more noticeable performance gains than going from a single to a dual 1Ghz P3 system. Mainly because, for most uses, BeOS simply doesn't need anything faster than 1Ghz.
Edited 2009-10-21 23:37 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-06
You probably won't notice much difference with the system itself - although video/audio encoding should be noticeably faster. BeOS (and presumably Haiku as well) doesn't really run faster with multiple CPUs/cores, but but it becomes next-to-impossible to make it lag or slow down.
I'm guessing you've already checked - but just in case, have you looked in the Media prefs to ensure that the CD audio input isn't muted? That was the default in R5 (not sure about Haiku), I remember that being one of the most common questions/complaints on the old comp.sys.be.help newsgroup.