Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 16th Dec 2009 00:13 UTC
Gnome In the item we ran yesterday about GNOME and the GNU Project, one aspect got snowed under a little bit. It turns out a claim made in the iTWire article about the role a blog post by Miguel De Icaza was false, and even though the claim wasn't ours, I did repeat it, and therefore, should correct it too. I also need to offer apologies for not framing the opening of the article clear enough - had I framed it better, a lot of pointless discussion and name-calling could've been avoided.
Thread beginning with comment 399898
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: how about...
by SlackerJack on Wed 16th Dec 2009 14:37 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: how about..."
Member since:

I expected it to get modded right down and apologies are worth nothing if you keep making the same mistakes, rather than research stories properly first.

It may have been harsh but the damage is done and no doubt it will happen again.

Edited 2009-12-16 14:38 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2