Linked by snydeq on Wed 16th Dec 2009 20:13 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 400236
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: I've given up on Parallels
by bannor99 on Fri 18th Dec 2009 17:00
in reply to "RE[2]: I've given up on Parallels"
"
Another example of why Linux' total disregard for stable interfaces is bad for users and vendors
Another example of why Linux' total disregard for stable interfaces is bad for users and vendors
Parallels isn't a Linux product and you can't blame Linux if the kernel breaks Parallels when it's supposed to be transparent to the OS (just like every other VM product is) "
It's been a while since I've used VMware on Linux but my experience then was hardly what one would call "transparent" - the installer built a kernel module for the running kernel.
If you change kernels or run mulitple, you would need
a kernel module for each. Not all the "user-friendly" distros have all the required dev tools installed for you to accomplish this, and, in some cases, like recent Ubuntus , it's not a straightforward process to obtain them.
RE[4]: I've given up on Parallels
by Laurence on Fri 18th Dec 2009 18:30
in reply to "RE[3]: I've given up on Parallels"




Member since:
2007-03-26
Another example of why Linux' total disregard for stable interfaces is bad for users and vendors
Parallels isn't a Linux product and you can't blame Linux if the kernel breaks Parallels when it's supposed to be transparent to the OS (just like every other VM product is)