Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 27th Dec 2009 14:12 UTC
KDE Since the stream of news is still pretty much dry, I figured I'd throw in something I've been meaning to talk about for a while now, but really didn't dare to: KDE4's performance. Since experiences with KDE4 seem to widely differ between people, it might be a good idea if we, together, can find a common cause among those of us having problems.
Thread beginning with comment 401345
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Icons
by nunopinheiro on Mon 28th Dec 2009 00:48 UTC in reply to "RE: Icons"
nunopinheiro
Member since:
2007-10-07

Can you provide some examples? If you are talking abut the icons in the panel there are no miracles if you render an icon of any of its sizes it will become blury... they are pixel perfect if its scaled the pixel perfect lines will allays become blurry, oxygen icon sizes are 16x16 22x22 32x32 48x48 64x64 128x18 and 256x256. For most of the icons we did a different icon for each size. (because of that oxygen is a 256 mb monster)

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[3]: Icons
by Thom_Holwerda on Mon 28th Dec 2009 01:14 in reply to "RE[2]: Icons"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

I didn't mean the icon thing as a really big problem - most likely, it's just a matter of taste. Oxygen is a beautiful icon set, I just personallly do not like Oxygen at smaller sizes.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: Icons
by nunopinheiro on Mon 28th Dec 2009 01:28 in reply to "RE[3]: Icons"
nunopinheiro Member since:
2007-10-07

Fair enough ;) we do our best.

Reply Parent Score: 1