Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 4th Feb 2010 20:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 408133
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: The "Accidental Monopolist"
by nt_jerkface on Sun 7th Feb 2010 02:27
in reply to "RE[4]: The "Accidental Monopolist""
If you bought a PS/2, they DID give it to you for free. You seem to be confused about something - there was a license fee to MS for every copy of OS/2 IBM "sold". Show me where MS gave away Windows if you DIDN'T get it with a computer.
I'm not confused about anything. OS/2 was overpriced and there are plenty of old reviews that show this:
http://books.google.com/books?id=QVAEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA33&lpg=PA33&dq=i...
There was a period where it really would have made a good server OS but they kept the price too high.




Member since:
2006-01-23
OS/2 failed due to lack of apps - due to Developers who were forced to choose between MS and IBM, and MS had more $$ for them.
As in NOT FREE? I had every version from 1.1, and all the betas and all the TCPIP betas. OS/2 was cheap compared to the hardware of the day.
If you bought a PS/2, they DID give it to you for free. You seem to be confused about something - there was a license fee to MS for every copy of OS/2 IBM "sold". Show me where MS gave away Windows if you DIDN'T get it with a computer.