To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Don't look any worse than OS X? Well, yes and no. Certainly, KDE 4.4 is up to par when it comes to themes (Oxygen has really matured into something attractive and unobtrusive) and catching up fast when it comes to desktop effects (the timing seems just a bit off, still), but when it comes to icons, layout, and especially default fonts and spacing, it needs a lot of work. Sane and attractive defaults matter quite a bit, especially when a user's not able or willing to root around in the various config dialogues to tweak them.
Do the better fonts and spacing even exist in a way that can be used by KDE(copyright and patent free)?
Frankly, I don't think default fonts and spacing are that bad. They may lose in a side by side comparison but I doubt most people can tell a "perfect" font from a "a bit off" one when actually using the software.
They are not like the fonts distros were using a few years ago.




Member since:
2008-02-26
KDE is getting to be quite good.
It is stable and responsive, and that matters to me.
Recent versions don't really look any worse than Mac OS X either if you care about that. IMO, after playing a bit with a Mac, it seems obvious that both KDE and Gnome are heavily inspired on Mac OS(The stupid control panel for example).
But while Gnome, well, is Gnome, the latest KDE does a better job in keeping the useless eye-candy from affecting usability negatively.
Now C++ and very few not quite excellent apps and applets are the only items remaining on my minus list.
If I had to recommend a Linux Desktop, without any doubt, it would have to be a KDE distribution.