Linked by David Adams on Fri 19th Mar 2010 21:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 414556
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-09-11
I don't like ads. I don't click ads. I don't make any buying decision based on ads and I have all the rights in the world to decide what goes in my web browser and through my internet connection. I have all the rights in the world to use ad block and no one can deny it.
On the other hand, the webmasters have all the rights to try tricking me to see the ads either by trying to block content when detecting ad blockers or by trying to write smarter code that goes through ad blockers (harder, if not impossible).
Then I have the right to either cease visiting that particular website - after all here is no site I can't live without - that's more likely or try to modify ad blocker's code to pass through detection.
Either way, he doesn't get publicity money from me, so he have to come up with another idea if he wants to see money from myself. I don't know, maybe offering some exciting new feature, that I'll think I can't live without and buy it.