Linked by Kroc Camen on Thu 29th Apr 2010 23:04 UTC
Internet Explorer I am almost flabbergasted by the spin and blunt-face upon which this news is delivered. We were just discussing the pot calling the kettle black with Apple / Adobe and now Microsoft have also come out in favour of a closed video format for an open web--IE9's HTML5 video support will allow H264 only. Update Now that the initial shock is over, I've rewritten the article to actually represent news rather than something on Twitter.
Thread beginning with comment 421667
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Huh?
by apoclypse on Fri 30th Apr 2010 00:45 UTC in reply to "RE: Huh?"
apoclypse
Member since:
2007-02-17

WTF are you talking about? Go to youtube. You see that crappy quality Flash video plying, guess what it was encoded in? Yeah, that'd be h.264. All this crap about h.264 but most internet video regardless of what container it uses, encode their video in h.264 because of the benefits of the format.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: Huh?
by lemur2 on Fri 30th Apr 2010 02:11 in reply to "RE[2]: Huh?"
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

WTF are you talking about? Go to youtube. You see that crappy quality Flash video plying, guess what it was encoded in? Yeah, that'd be h.264. All this crap about h.264 but most internet video regardless of what container it uses, encode their video in h.264 because of the benefits of the format.


Neither Flash nor h264 is a web satndard.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: Huh?
by aesiamun on Fri 30th Apr 2010 04:23 in reply to "RE[3]: Huh?"
aesiamun Member since:
2005-06-29

Repeating it does not make up for the fact that you haven't given any proof...

Your repetition is one of the key things that you shouldn't do to an INTJ...yet you seem to keep doing it.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Huh?
by phoenix on Fri 30th Apr 2010 04:32 in reply to "RE[3]: Huh?"
phoenix Member since:
2005-07-11

Technically, it's still a standard for video encoding/decoding. As in, gone through the ITU standardisation process, such that it was given the name H.264.

Yes, it's not "the standard for video on the web". But it's still a standard.

Just like OOXML is a standard for office documents.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Huh?
by segedunum on Sat 1st May 2010 00:51 in reply to "RE[2]: Huh?"
segedunum Member since:
2005-07-06

Go to youtube. You see that crappy quality Flash video plying, guess what it was encoded in? Yeah, that'd be h.264.

Flash is not h.264 sunshine. What the f--k are you talking about? It has no relevance to HTML5 distribution of internet video whatsoever. The end result is still Flash encoded.

Edited 2010-05-01 00:54 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2