Linked by Kroc Camen on Sun 9th May 2010 12:34 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y "Dear Ubuntu, for the last couple years life has been good. Every time I've shown you to a friend or family member, they've compared you to what they're familiar with--Windows XP or Vista, mostly--and by comparison you've looked brilliant. Yeah, your ugly brown color scheme was a bit off-putting at first, but once people saw how secure, simple, and reliable you were, the response was almost universally positive. But recently, things have changed ..."
Thread beginning with comment 423355
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by daedalus8
by daedalus8 on Sun 9th May 2010 13:22 UTC
Member since:


It's not like I want to mock you or anything, but I believe this is a quite a biased article. I don't believe your friend has enough experience in the security field to be able to say that one OS is more secure than the other. Windows UAC is really not as secured as you think, sure Windows has made LOTS of improvements in this area but I believe that Linux still has the upper hand.

Secondly, that sarcasm about spending 6 hours per computer to change the UI is totally out of proportion, and frankly, very disappointing, I can tell that your friend installed Linux in a VM and took a couple of screen-shots and was done with it. Also, have you tried changing the Windows 7 UI? Yep, you either need to patch the OS or use custom paid tools. Linux is free and is quite easy these days.

I do have to say that Windows 7 is a very big step in the right direction for Microsoft and I applaud their efforts into making a reliable OS.

I also have to agree with the latter piece of the article where he talks about the relationship between Canonical and the developers. I have to say that the buttons issue is just the tip of the iceberg. I think that the community is starting to grow tired about their voices not being heard, and I just hope that Canonical realizes this and starts putting a little bit more effort into hearing what their customers/developers want and not what they think is right.

Reply Score: 8

RE: Comment by daedalus8
by abstraction on Sun 9th May 2010 13:31 in reply to "Comment by daedalus8"
abstraction Member since:

This article isnt based on facts. That is why it is biased.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: Comment by daedalus8
by Kroc on Sun 9th May 2010 13:33 in reply to "Comment by daedalus8"
Kroc Member since:

Windows UAC is really not as secured as you think

Oh, I know that well ;)

I can tell that your friend installed Linux in a VM and took a couple of screen-shots and was done with it.

To the best of my knowledge he uses Linux full time. He writes this article because as a Linux user he’s willing to see where improvements need to be made rather than deny the problems exist.

I chose his article because he is a Linux user, where as I’m not, and any such problems I could highlight with Linux are not really spoken from someone who is investing in the platform. Biased, more than likely, but I respect that he’s trying to see things from the perspective of an average user who has no understanding of the reasons behind any shortcoming in a technology.

Reply Parent Score: 1