Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd May 2010 09:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 426182
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Looking at the "park joy" example provided by the second comparison the x264 encoded image is visibly sharper than its VP8 counterpart, especially in parts with lots of foliage and grass (i.e. small details). I'm not familiar with the encoder settings so I would like to know if the settings used for x264 produce encodings compatible to the baseline profile.
That's to be expected. A similar (or same?) scene was used to show the improvements in Theora - this was also less blurry after the codec was improved.
VPx codecs generally tend to blur the image to save bit. I guess VP8 can fix that just like Theora (being based on VP3) did
Edited 2010-05-23 19:36 UTC




Member since:
2007-06-22
Looking at the "park joy" example provided by the second comparison the x264 encoded image is visibly sharper than its VP8 counterpart, especially in parts with lots of foliage and grass (i.e. small details). I'm not familiar with the encoder settings so I would like to know if the settings used for x264 produce encodings compatible to the baseline profile.