Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd May 2010 09:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 426183
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison
by Neolander on Sun 23rd May 2010 17:40
in reply to "RE[3]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison"
I think you should compare gif to png. That's more inline with the usage pattern.
Yes, but as far as I know PNG did not exist at that time. GIF was a superior format on the 256-color screens in term of compression vs image quality, but JPEG was safer.
(True, PNG beats them all, I use this format for just about everything which doesn't require layers or animation ^^ But at the time, there was a compromise about compression quality vs licensing quality)
Edited 2010-05-23 17:45 UTC
RE[5]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison
by Timmmm on Sun 23rd May 2010 18:45
in reply to "RE[4]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison"
RE[5]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison
by Lennie on Sun 23rd May 2010 20:16
in reply to "RE[4]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison"
RE[4]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison
by sorpigal on Mon 24th May 2010 11:13
in reply to "RE[3]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison"
PNG was created when patent fears about GIF began to seem reasonable. It is not reasonable to compare PNG and GIF therefore because for many years there was no such option; the choices were JPEG and GIF, or to take a chance that the client would support some other format and have the bandwidth to download it.
PNG is superior to GIF in almost every way. It does not animate and under certain very specific scenarios has inferior compression. Other than those it is superior.
PNG is superior to JPEG in image quality, being lossless, but for photographic imagery compresses much less well.
Today GIF is used almost exclusively for its animations, since no other means of animation is natively supported by all browsers.
RE[5]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison
by lemur2 on Mon 24th May 2010 11:34
in reply to "RE[4]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison"
PNG was created when patent fears about GIF began to seem reasonable. It is not reasonable to compare PNG and GIF therefore because for many years there was no such option; the choices were JPEG and GIF, or to take a chance that the client would support some other format and have the bandwidth to download it.
PNG is superior to GIF in almost every way. It does not animate and under certain very specific scenarios has inferior compression. Other than those it is superior.
PNG is superior to JPEG in image quality, being lossless, but for photographic imagery compresses much less well.
Today GIF is used almost exclusively for its animations, since no other means of animation is natively supported by all browsers.
PNG is superior to GIF in almost every way. It does not animate and under certain very specific scenarios has inferior compression. Other than those it is superior.
PNG is superior to JPEG in image quality, being lossless, but for photographic imagery compresses much less well.
Today GIF is used almost exclusively for its animations, since no other means of animation is natively supported by all browsers.
http://people.mozilla.com/~dolske/apng/demo.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APNG
http://animatedpng.com/
Enjoy. Especially Chompy. (You will need Firefox 3.0 or later, or Opera).





Member since:
2007-09-22
I think you should compare gif to png. That's more inline with the usage pattern.