Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd May 2010 09:41 UTC
Benchmarks Now that Google has opened up VP8, the big question is obviously how it'll hold up to H264. Of course, VP8 already wins by default because it's open source and royalty free, but that doesn't mean we should neglect the quality issue. Jan Ozer from has put up an article comparing the two codecs, and concludes that the differences are negligible - in fact, only in some high-motion videos did H264 win out. As always, this is just one comparison and most certainly anything but conclusive. Update: Another comparison. I can't spot the difference, but then again, I'm no expert.
Thread beginning with comment 426195
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison
by izomiac on Sun 23rd May 2010 16:49 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison"
Member since:

Are SI units used, or standard computing units? 15000 Kib would be 15360000 bits, giving x264 a 2.4% advantage. OTOH rounding might trump that, I'm didn't download the videos to check the actual bitrates.

Reply Parent Score: 1

transwarp Member since:

AFAIK, bits are always counted in base 10. It's bytes that use powers of 2. Are there any situations where a kilobit is 1024 bits?

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison
by JLF65 on Sun 23rd May 2010 18:29 in reply to "RE[3]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison"
JLF65 Member since:

Video encoding ALWAYS uses base 10 values. So it's 1000 or 1000000, not 1024 or 1048576.

Reply Parent Score: 3