Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 4th Jun 2010 22:36 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 428436
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: GPL would be better in my opinion
by nt_jerkface on Sun 6th Jun 2010 23:07
in reply to "RE[2]: GPL would be better in my opinion"
Remember kerberos? MS did an interesting job of undermining that with their incompatible implementation.
How did they undermine kerberos? By adding their own proprietary extensions? If that same software was GPLd they wouldn't be using it at all. Would that be a win for open source? What would be gained?
RE[4]: GPL would be better in my opinion
by raboof on Sun 6th Jun 2010 23:22
in reply to "RE[3]: GPL would be better in my opinion"
How did they undermine kerberos? By adding their own proprietary extensions?
Yes, because those extensions made their kerberos implementation incompatible with the standard implementation in unix. It's not a perfect analogy to what lemur2 claimed would be impossible, but a pretty close match.
If that same software was GPLd they wouldn't be using it at all. Would that be a win for open source? What would be gained?
I am not claiming that at all. As said, I agree the BSD license is a sane choice in this case. But it does not provide the safeties lemur2 talks about.





Member since:
2005-07-24
Jep.
You wish...
Remember kerberos? MS did an interesting job of undermining that with their incompatible implementation.
Anyway, I'd still say BSD is a sane choice over GPL in this particular case, though I usually license any client software I write myself under the GPL. Different licenses for different situations.