Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th Jun 2010 12:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 429539
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I always sort of figured that if Linux didn't have any way of communicating with the printer then a vm wouldn't be able to either. If it can, then it frees me a little more.
A Linux VM wouldn't. But if it's just a matter of a missing driver, if a Windows VM has access to the hardware device (parallel port, USB, whatever) it can make use of that device.




Member since:
2009-06-10
"Personally, I also have a printer that's not supported by linux (or not good, there are drivers but they don't seem to work on new distributions). It's one of the few things I use VirtualBox for: I use a virtual machine for printing."
Does that work? I'm asking out of curiosity because recently I had a scanner from someone (desperately needed to scan) and it was a paperweight in Linux. I ended up rebooting into Windows 7 to use it. Having not booted Windows for a couple of months it was the never ending annoyance of popups for outdated virus definitions, windows updates, etc.
I always sort of figured that if Linux didn't have any way of communicating with the printer then a vm wouldn't be able to either. If it can, then it frees me a little more.