Linked by Kroc Camen on Sat 26th Jun 2010 10:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 431628
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Not to be persnickety
by Tuishimi on Sat 26th Jun 2010 16:45
in reply to "RE: Not to be persnickety"
RE[2]: Not to be persnickety
by tbutler on Sat 26th Jun 2010 19:29
in reply to "RE: Not to be persnickety"
It is just an odd notation when referring to things as impersonal as large corporations. The singular collective usage seems to be more frequent than plural collective in most British books and publications I read. More interestingly, I've noticed OSNews will sometimes vary its usage within a given article, which makes it stand out more.
Typically a collective plural verb seems to be best applied when trying to emphasize the individuals within the collective.
RE[2]: Not to be persnickety
by nt_jerkface on Sun 27th Jun 2010 14:35
in reply to "RE: Not to be persnickety"





Member since:
2005-06-29
I would think t3h int4rweb would know by now that there are two main branches of English today (en-gb and en-us).