To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Repeating what I said earlier. Combined with blogging journalism, I know that Forbes magazine has been more concerned about subjects of profit, and such formats just make it worse, although they have really been that way for years.
It's not the idle rich that have the great tech (and Forbes DOES write to a very affluent audience); it's more the working class folk. This has been written about in other tech media sectors (home audio, etc.) before, by other authors.
I don't think geeks/nerds are getting that. The almighty buck will not always pay for geek idealism or ideology. Corporate backing is fueling some segments of Linux and open source development.
Techies/grunts and management are usually in pretty separate worlds-- paradigms, behaviors, working styles, etc., etc., etc. I've learned that well enough at the office.
Y'all are preaching to the choir here because I can assure you Forbes ain't listening.





Member since:
2007-12-08
People actually get paid to write things like that? Christ, that would make an ok but annoying strawman post on a message board. But I'd have assumed forbes would have a more strict policy. That's almost a picture perfect example of how not to objectively look at something. He comes to a conclusion, cherry picks emotional arguments against it while ignoring well made ones, and then calls anyone who disagrees a nerd.