Linked by David Adams on Mon 26th Jul 2010 01:02 UTC, submitted by HAL2001
Thread beginning with comment 434724
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-30
I didn't know of these security/embedded concerns and certification processes/organisms. It's a shame that I'm just as ignorant after reading the linked article: unless you're already in the field, you won't know what it's talking about. It's a shame the author of the post in unknown as all that can be read is "posted on...".
It's a shame I'm still asking myself a few questions: if this Wind River linux is the first secure embedded Linux-based OS to be certified, what other certified OSes are there? I guess there are several similar Linux-based embedded/and or secure OS... what's their status as to running for that certification? why hasn't any Linux OS applied before as they are not new? It's hinted somewhere that the process is difficult. In what aspects of it? what are the constraints that make it that drastic ?