Linked by David Adams on Sat 31st Jul 2010 06:05 UTC, submitted by fran
Thread beginning with comment 434982
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-04
I think that the implementation and product hierarchy re: UI graphics is one way that Ballmer and Co. have painted themselves into a corner:
- They have made DirectX 9 the minimum requirement for graphics processors to use their "Aero" desktop effects, and have written all of their fancy desktop effects UI code using DirectX.
- They have disabled Aero on all but the most expensive versions of Windows, and even disabled customizing desktop wallpaper in Win7 starter.
- People expect fancy, pretty, user-customizable, fast-updating effects on tablets, thanks to Android and IOS.
- Aero was designed to be the "touch-friendly" UI for Windows 7.
So Microsoft now seems to be stuck with depending on their proprietary DirectX to power the "new Win7 tablet", and must find a way to power a DirectX chipset which draws more power than chipsets used by Android and IOS systems, while also having to "give" away its previously high-priced "deluxe" graphics-capable OS for almost nothing to compete in the $499 tablet market. Bad luck, Mr. Ballmer.