Linked by David Adams on Thu 5th Aug 2010 19:45 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Internet Explorer The British government has rejected a call to dump Microsoft's Internet Explorer 6 (IE6), saying that it is saving taxpayers' money by staying with the nine-year-old browser.
Thread beginning with comment 435853
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Doesn't make sense
by bert64 on Sun 8th Aug 2010 19:08 UTC in reply to "Doesn't make sense"
Member since:

They can't drop IE6 right away, far too many of their apps are completely locked in to it and a migration would be hugely expensive right now.

What they should be doing however, is making long term plans. While it might be expensive to replace existing applications, ensuring that future applications (and upgrades to existing ones) offer compatibility with all browsers is considerably cheaper.

They should be making plans to replace IE6 once all their other applications are cross browser compatibility, and at this point they should really be dumping IE entirely. No other browser vendor has ever pursued a strategy of locking users in, or caused such a large amount of lasting harm (as can be seen in this case).

The government should take a cautious long term approach, with the ultimate goal being to ensure that lock-in like this doesn't happen again.

Unfortunately, government IT projects are usually corrupt and incompetent, so i don't hold much hope that 10 years from now people will be saying the same thing about being locked to IE8...

Reply Parent Score: 2