Linked by boulabiar on Mon 16th Aug 2010 21:36 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 437209
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-11
Actually, this isn't entirely true. While most distros continued to ship KDE3 and offered KDE4 as an option, Fedora shipping KDE4 as the default (Fedora 9) and refused to provide a KDE3 package.
Though for the most part, the over-all commentary is correct. It was made perfectly clear by KDE, and by the distributions, that KDE 4.0 was an early development system and no one in their right minds should have assumed it would be stable.
People who are complaining it wasn't ready are just pointing out their own foolishness.