Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Aug 2010 21:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 438708
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: So the people who know about the merger...
by telns on Mon 30th Aug 2010 22:26
in reply to "So the people who know about the merger..."
I think AMD is attempting to shore up their own brand as a technology company, not just a CPU company.
It takes time and effort to manage a brand. Managing two discrete brands doubles that time and effort.
If the ATI brand is not in and of itself incredibly valuable, it is likely to be both cheaper in terms of management, and more valuable to the AMD brand, to fold it in.
RE: So the people who know about the merger...
by Zifre on Mon 30th Aug 2010 23:18
in reply to "So the people who know about the merger..."
while I always thought the Ati Brand had a somewhat cheap feel to it, I doubt that AMD will immediately become a trusted Graphics Hardware builder to the less informed people, especially if the first products to come out are low end embedded GPUs.
I wouldn't really worry about that. Most people don't even know what a graphics card is, let alone care which company makes it. The only people who care are the gamers, and they probably known enough to know that AMD graphics cards are ATI graphics cards.




Member since:
2006-05-29
So the people who know about the merger don't care, but those are hardly the people you have to reach with emotion targeted marketing anyway and while I always thought the Ati Brand had a somewhat cheap feel to it, I doubt that AMD will immediately become a trusted Graphics Hardware builder to the less informed people, especially if the first products to come out are low end embedded GPUs.
Thus I think this is overall a bad decision and while very temporary in effect I predict a sales drop for at least a few months for the rebranded GPU products.