Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 14th Sep 2010 22:42 UTC
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu If there's one consistent piece of criticism that gets lobbed in Canonical's and Mark Shuttleworth's direction, it's that they do not contribute enough code - or anything else for that matter - to the Free software world. Mark Shuttleworth has apparently had enough, and has written a very, very lengthy blog post detailing how he feels about this criticism.
Thread beginning with comment 441079
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
AdamW
Member since:
2005-07-06

"Anyone complaining about Ubuntu not contributing code upstream has to ask themselves, does it matter? Does the fact that Ubuntu contributes or not upstream affect Linux either way?"

Absolutely. Yes, it does. How can it be otherwise? Canonical is by far the company with the largest engineering resources in the 'free desktop operating system' sector. In the overall free software sector, it's probably only behind Red Hat and Novell (depending on how you treat big companies with small OSS departments). How can it *not* be significant how much work this very important engineering workforce does on the free desktop ecosystem? Wouldn't our graphics drivers, network drivers, sound drivers, and desktop applications be better if Canonical were devoting a part of its engineering resources to developing them?

Reply Parent Score: 4

Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

Wouldn't our graphics drivers, network drivers, sound drivers, and desktop applications be better if Canonical were devoting a part of its engineering resources to developing them?


Yes, because that strategy has worked out SO WELL for the desktop efforts of Mandriva, Red Hat, and SUSE.

Reply Parent Score: -1

felipec Member since:
2007-09-25

"Wouldn't our graphics drivers, network drivers, sound drivers, and desktop applications be better if Canonical were devoting a part of its engineering resources to developing them?


Yes, because that strategy has worked out SO WELL for the desktop efforts of Mandriva, Red Hat, and SUSE.
"
It does. I'm using an open ATI driver without any problems developed with a lot of funding from RedHat.

If the driver wasn't working I would be screwed the moment ATI stopped supporting my card on the closed driver.

Reply Parent Score: 2