Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Sep 2010 20:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 442570
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yawn.
Of course you didn't mean anything, you were just showing that popularity does not equal quality by example of products that are negatively stereotyped with unrefined mainstream taste. No implications there at all.
Funny how Android is being snapped up by the mainstream but I don't see anyone here questioning its quality based on popularity.
Yawn.
Oh please, we both know you're not cool; if you were, you wouldn't be here. Of course you didn't mean anything, you were just showing that popularity does not equal quality by example of products that are negatively stereotyped with unrefined mainstream taste.
No, that wasn't what I was 'showing' at all. No implications there at all.
Evidentially not, given your continued failure to comprehend a simple facetious point. Funny how Android is being snapped up by the mainstream but I don't see anyone here questioning its quality based on popularity.
Uh huh... run this by me one more time. You think these premises are the same? popularity does not equal quality
...
questioning its quality based on popularity
...
questioning its quality based on popularity
You go from stating that there's no relationship, to stating that there's an inversely proportional one. You go to the trouble of setting up a strawman, then proceed to a non sequitur. No wonder you're having so much trouble: you can't even follow your own bullshit to it's logical conclusion, let alone anyone else's.




Member since:
2010-06-19
Which stereotype would that be again? I can think of many one might associate with Ford: the gas guzzler, the blue collar ute, the superfluous SUV, the 'chick's car' hatchback, the 'bogan's pride' hatchback/sedan...
or maybe, just maybe, I was playing upon the idea of Ford vehicles being generally average, pedestrian, boring, indistinct, plastic and plain old mediocre, for the purposes of making a f--king joke.
Don't mistake your lack of perspective and imagination for some telepathic insight into the mind of someone else. Besides being arrogant, it just makes you look stupid when you inevitably fail to consider a myriad of likely contingencies.
Ooh, you're a sharp one, you are. Ever consider that that was the joke?
Edited 2010-09-24 17:47 UTC