To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Why should someone like Google be able to prevent someone from shipping an OS that includes their apps?
Shouldn’t the platform allow any apps, open or closed, regardless of vendor?
What if Linux distributors were not allowed to include an open source VOIP client, if they include Skype. Or no open PDF reader if Adobe reader is used?
Sod them! Google should not have control over other apps if its apps are present too, it’s madness.
Not really. Not even close.
Even though I can't replace the OS on my Sony Ericsson Android phone due to a proprietary bootloader, I can still change just about any feature. For instance, I have installed a replacement home screen, a different SMS app, a different softkeyboard, etc. I can also install any app that I write myself or download from the internet, even if they break with the Android Market rules. There's plenty of room for new paradigms and Google-unsanctioned innovation on a stock Android phone. It's about as open to innovation as OS X and Windows are.




Member since:
2005-11-10
Canonical may only ship Ubuntu with google.com as the default if we [Google] get to dictate the default wallpaper, theme and software packages used.
What Google have been doing is worse than Apple having a completely closed system. This sets the precedent that in the future the code on our computers will be open but the systems themselves will be completely closed and unable to be anything other than what the company dictates. No hobby OSes, no new paradigms, no innovation unless Google have say first.