Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Oct 2010 16:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 445620
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: It cannot be included
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Mon 18th Oct 2010 23:44
in reply to "RE[6]: It cannot be included"
No offence, but I think its terrible. Its not that an ipad is borderline on one of those. I think it meets all three as well as some laptops and desktops do. And I don't think an ipad is a pc. Therefore, I do not think it is a good system of classification.
Maybe you should define tablets and smart phones first, then the classification of PC might jump out at you as being something that meets these criteria but not the smart phone /tablet definition.




Member since:
2005-07-12
I think my above post is probably the most sensible definition, but what is a PC or isn't is a mostly arbitrary decision, and an actual classification system isn't likely to ever be defined.
It may very well be that in 10 years, iPad-type devices will be considered standard PCs, but what most people think of as a PC is nothing like an iPad. It is a new device, and deserves it's own classification.