Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 21st Oct 2010 22:28 UTC, submitted by tux68
Thread beginning with comment 446530
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Great for Linux, but this indicates financial fraud
by rexstuff on Mon 25th Oct 2010 05:00
in reply to "RE: Great for Linux, but this indicates financial fraud"
Sorry, but there just isn't a scam here. The supposed problem, 'front running', requires that an exchange be willing to sell information about pending orders; clearly stated in the Wikipedia article and even admitted on 'Web of Debt', this is a practice that most major exchanges do not allow.
Also, you need to be more skeptical of what you read online, or just find better sources. 'Web of Debt' in particular is lacking credibility. It quotes anonymous sources and people named 'Tyler Durden', uses ad-hominems and describes itself as revealing 'the shocking truth' and that is 'eye-opening'. It's like the National Enquirer of financial news.




Member since:
2006-01-07
I see that my post didn't go over well. But I stand behind it. Some of you commenters should have done a little googling before replying. But OK, my mistake for not providing more links (see below).
By the way, if any of you think that I made this comment because I'm "anti-Linux", you've got it totally wrong. I use Linux, and love it. The problem isn't Linux, it's the crooks on Wall Street. The fact that the crooks use Linux (because it's a superior OS) doesn't change the fact that they're crooks.
Yes, HFT does have some positive aspects, as one of the posters above pointed out. But the stock markets (particularly in New York, I don't know about London) are rampant with corruption. Anyone who hasn't heard the term "bankster" by now hasn't been paying attention. These people don't lose any sleep ripping off their own clients.
As above poster also noted, I did propose a solution (putting all trades into a one-minute queue, with whopping big fines for non-compliance). I'm not the first one to think of that, but needless to say, the banksters scoff and say that would be another example of over-regulation. Meanwhile, they've got their second passports and they're filling up their bank accounts in Hong Kong and the Cayman Islands.
So here are a couple more links (along with a few notable quotes):
=====================
COMPUTERIZED FRONT RUNNING:
ANOTHER GOLDMAN-DOMINATED FRAUD
http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/computerized_front_running.php
...called High Frequency Trading (HFT) or “black box trading,” automated program trading uses high-speed computers governed by complex algorithms (instructions to the computer) to analyze data and transact orders in massive quantities at very high speeds. Like the poker player peeking in a mirror to see his opponent’s cards, HFT allows the program trader to peek at major incoming orders and jump in front of them to skim profits off the top. And these large institutional orders are our money -- our pension funds, mutual funds, and 401Ks...
===================================
Goldman Sach’s High Frequency Trading Scam
http://www.investingblog.org/archives/520/goldman-sachs-high-freque...
One of the biggest market newsmakers recently has been Goldman Sach’s high frequency trading program. The automated system is incredibly complex, using data obtained from the NASDAQ and NYSE markets to front run virtually every trade that happens on the exchange...
Edited 2010-10-22 08:58 UTC