Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 13th Dec 2010 19:27 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Mono Project For the most time, I've been firmly in the largest camp when it comes to the Mono debate - the 'I don't care'-camp. With patent lawsuits being hotter than Lady Gaga right now, that changed. For good reason, so it seems; while firmly in the 'ZOMG-MICROSOFT-IS-T3H-EVILL!1!!ONE!'-camp, investigated the five most popular Mono applications, and the conclusion is clear: all of them implement a lot of namespaces which are not covered by Microsoft's community promise thing.
Thread beginning with comment 453407
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Big fekkin surprise
by Kasi on Tue 14th Dec 2010 03:59 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Big fekkin surprise"
Member since:

Its not like there is dearth of programming languages that are fully implemented in way that is safe to use.

I just don't understand this fascination with .NET, Mono, or Java for that matter. It seems like very on wants to pretend they are with the big boys.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Big fekkin surprise
by TheGZeus on Tue 14th Dec 2010 17:26 in reply to "RE[3]: Big fekkin surprise"
TheGZeus Member since:


I don't understand GNOME, or even GTK in the face of how good Qt and a number of other toolkits are...
I don't have to, though. I can just... not use them.

Reply Parent Score: 2