Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 21st Dec 2010 22:56 UTC, submitted by fran
Windows Very light on details, but this is interesting nonetheless - very interesting, and potentially one of the biggest things to have hit the operating systems business this decade. Bloomberg is reporting that Microsoft plans to announce Windows for ARM processors at CES in January 2011.
Thread beginning with comment 454370
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: what's the point?
by perlid on Tue 21st Dec 2010 23:53 UTC in reply to "what's the point?"
perlid
Member since:
2010-12-21

Desperate move? Would you say the same if support for a new architecture was added to Linux or *BSD? Probably not, right?
As has been demonstrated by both iOS and Android, new platforms can gain acceptance and applications fairly quickly, if they provide something people want.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: what's the point?
by 0brad0 on Wed 22nd Dec 2010 00:10 in reply to "RE: what's the point?"
0brad0 Member since:
2007-05-05

Desperate move? Would you say the same if support for a new architecture was added to Linux or *BSD? Probably not, right?
As has been demonstrated by both iOS and Android, new platforms can gain acceptance and applications fairly quickly, if they provide something people want.


Of course not because *BSD/Linux already run on almost every CPU architecture out there. Desktop incarnations of Windows runs on exactly one. That is a desperation move and Microsoft has a lot of work cut out for them to be even remotely competitive. From a performance perspective they'll also face similar issues as they do with netbooks but even more so.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[3]: what's the point?
by perlid on Wed 22nd Dec 2010 00:30 in reply to "RE[2]: what's the point?"
perlid Member since:
2010-12-21

Of course not because *BSD/Linux already run on almost every CPU architecture out there.


Your argument makes no sense. Did you also think is was a desperate move when, back in the days, Linux went from x86-only to also support its second architecture? I didn't think so. My point here is that the reason why people like yourself want to call this a desperate move, is simply because you don't like Microsoft and their products (btw, me neither), but that has nothing to do with them being desperate, but more about people spreading FUD because they think Microsoft is "evil" and desperately want them to fail.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: what's the point?
by lucas_maximus on Wed 22nd Dec 2010 14:00 in reply to "RE[2]: what's the point?"
lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

Of course not because *BSD/Linux already run on almost every CPU architecture out there. Desktop incarnations of Windows runs on exactly one. That is a desperation move and Microsoft has a lot of work cut out for them to be even remotely competitive. From a performance perspective they'll also face similar issues as they do with netbooks but even more so.


Windows NT kernel is built to be portable (there is a version of Windows XP for Itanium and Windows Server 2008 for Itanium also). The diagram below is the Windows 2000 architecture, I have seen similar diagrams for Windows VISTA & 7, but I couldn't find it with a 2 second google. However it illustrates the point.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Windows_2000_architecture.svg

Notice at the bottom there is a Hardware Abstraction Layer. This is where I would imagine (I am a web developer not systems developer so I can't say for certain) most of the main development will be in porting Windows to ARM (if it does indeed happen).

Secondly, Windows 7 & Windows 2008 R2 are highly modular e.g. We have Windows 2008 R2 servers which boot up without the windows shell, i.e. DOS prompt and not much else, you pretty much need to know powershell to interact with it. I don't doubt they will customise the build to include what is necessary.

Thirdly Windows 7 already support multitouch, and they already have a touch based UI with Windows Phone 7.

I agree with the other poster I doubt this is a desperate move, I think it is a pro-active one.

Edited 2010-12-22 14:04 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4