Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 3rd Jan 2011 11:53 UTC, submitted by SReilly
Thread beginning with comment 455704
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Requiring approval after the fact? Now that's interesting law.
One of the accusations is that he started to have sex with a woman while she was still asleep, i.e. being woken by or after the inital penetration.
Which would already make this non-consentual since a sleeping person cannot give or withdraw consent.
And I think another detail of that accusation was that she insisted on use of a condom on the evening before, making it highly likely that she would do so again on the next morning. Or would have done so if been given the opportunity to actual participate in this decision.
Edit: I wanted to apologize for continuing this offtopic thread branch, since the article is about kettling Wikileaks by cutting it off from its distribution and supply channels
Edited 2011-01-04 12:13 UTC




Member since:
2010-02-08
Requiring approval after the fact? Now that's interesting law.