Linked by snydeq on Tue 8th Mar 2011 23:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 465480
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: A rather immediate reason
by elsewhere on Thu 10th Mar 2011 05:25
in reply to "RE[2]: A rather immediate reason"
Samba has been underfunded for years and companies like Novell don't seem to care.
You chose the one company in the world that generates hundreds of millions of dollars from selling the only commercially viable alternative to Microsoft's directory/network services to criticize for not funding an open source alternative to Microsoft's directory/network services. Netware is slowly dying on it's own, last thing Novell needs to do is accelerate the process.
And despite that, the lead Samba developer was in fact a Novell employee. At least until he quit and went to Google, after the whole Microsoft deal thingie.
I don't disagree with your sentiment, but really.




Member since:
2009-08-26
No it is not that simple.
Both Linux and Unix vendors have not cared about the small or medium business markets or working to make it easier to integrate Windows networks with Unix services. Samba has been underfunded for years and companies like Novell don't seem to care.
MS keeps improving software like SBS, exchange, sharepoint and AD while companies like Red Hat continue to focus on big Unix migrations.
Red Hat has even stated that they aren't trying to convert MS shops.