Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd May 2011 22:13 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 474322
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Ridiculously Overpriced
by poundsmack on Tue 24th May 2011 14:55
in reply to "RE[2]: Ridiculously Overpriced"
RE[4]: Ridiculously Overpriced
by tanishaj on Tue 24th May 2011 15:20
in reply to "RE[3]: Ridiculously Overpriced"
I don't think it's over priced and I gladly pay that much for it. They aren't trying to spread it around like wild fire, they are just trying to keep afloat.
Given, if they dropped the price it likely would have more people checking it out, but still.
Given, if they dropped the price it likely would have more people checking it out, but still.
Perfectly fair that you do not feel it is overpriced. Economics tells us that the same products are worth different prices to different buyers after-all.
My feeling is that it is mis-priced (too high) however in the sense that a different price would maximize profit. They are limiting their market share and their profit.
$149 for a home user is just too high. For one thing, it is above the psychological price point for the market these days. Second, it just does not offer enough value relative to competing solutions like Windows. It is great that it comes with a 5-seat license but most people do not need that. Also, they have no "upgrade" option for users of competing products.
I get that eComstation is pretty much a business only (and legacy) OS at this point. I also assume that IBM is constraining their options on pricing. The lifetime even the existing installed base is threatened by these policies however.
There are a lot of people in the "hobbyist" and developer camps, such as myself, that have fond memories of OS/2. I wager that Having a low cost developer option ($49 or so) would make a lot of sense. Giving free copies to Open Source projects that support eComstation would be even smarter.
I am impressed that projects like Firefox and OpenOffice.org (LibreOffice?) still support OS/2 but I am sure the situation could be improved if the barrier to entry for developers was dropped.
With a little boost to the software ecosystem, we could see the niche market for eComstation significantly extended. The overall market share could even grow. It is far too late for OS/2 to be a mainstream OS contender. It is not too late for it to be the core of a profitable software ecosystem for a smart company that can execute well.
RE[3]: Ridiculously Overpriced
by Adurbe on Wed 25th May 2011 19:33
in reply to "RE[2]: Ridiculously Overpriced"
If students learn how to use a new OS it can only be a good thing in my view. Its these same students that will one day be in the position of CHOOSING the os a business buys.
I would argue, that for long-term longevity, they should concentrate More on the student editions. Basically making it as 'disposably cheap' as possible so more people can have a taste for it.
My university was very good at making us use multiple OS for different kinds of tasks. It might have felt a bit pointless at the time (everyone used windows for everything it seemed) but kindled my interest in such things, leading me to sites like OSNews 





Member since:
2011-03-18
You're very likely right. Still, then, why bother having a "Home and Student" version? Seems like that money would be better spent marketing the business version.