Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 21st Jun 2011 09:33 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 478013
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: One way in which DDG wins over Google and Bing...
by shmerl on Tue 21st Jun 2011 19:46
in reply to "One way in which DDG wins over Google and Bing..."
RE: One way in which DDG wins over Google and Bing...
by ndrw on Wed 22nd Jun 2011 04:38
in reply to "One way in which DDG wins over Google and Bing..."
Fair enough, you were interested in this particular kind of advocacy and DDG worked better for you. Which is great, in the end, that's all that matters. But I'm pretty sure DDG omitted some of the interesting content too. You simply can't fit every rant people wrote on "nt vs unix" on a single page.




Member since:
2007-02-22
For a long time, I've been wanting to find a simple article that delineates the differences between *nix-style kernels and NT-style kernels. Not high-level design or end-user; actual ways in which their handling of processes, memory, and devices differ. It's one of those searches that I keep making at least montly - and which neither of the 'big two' serve up right.
Search on Google? Linux advocacy, hosting ads, FUD, linux advocacy.
Search on Bing? Linux advocacy, hosting ads, Microsoft ads, linux advocacy.
Search on Duck Duck Go? I finally found this article written by Mark Russinovich: http://www.windowsitpro.com/print/interoperability/nt-vs-unix-is-on...
Yes, the article is basic; yes, the article has a bias; yes, the article is thirteen years old. But considering Duck Duck Go has been able to return on search one what Google and Microsoft haven't been able to return in a year's time, I'm already quite impressed.