Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 5th Jul 2011 22:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 479637
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Patents are patents
by ourcomputerbloke on Wed 6th Jul 2011 00:35
in reply to "RE: Patents are patents"
Software patents act in contravention of their Constitutional purpose: to promote the useful arts. Too many mundane ideas have been patented, because someone virtualized a physical process. Simply tacking "on a mobile" or "on the internet" shouldn't meet anyone's definition of "novel" or "non-obvious".
Which is why there definitely needs to be patent reform, but the idea that software patents are totally invalid, or indeed evil :S, is ill-conceived by those who have clearly never invested significant time or money into the development of software concepts.
RE[3]: Patents are patents
by TechGeek on Wed 6th Jul 2011 00:49
in reply to "RE[2]: Patents are patents"
Which is why there definitely needs to be patent reform, but the idea that software patents are totally invalid, or indeed evil :S, is ill-conceived by those who have clearly never invested significant time or money into the development of software concepts.
Software concepts? What exactly new and innovated concepts are you talking about? A computer can do nothing that its hardware was not designed to allow. That design is the substance of the hardware patent covering its technology. As such, it exists as prior art for anything you do with the device. The same is pretty much true for coding. Since it all boils down to 1's and 0's which are interrupted by the computer, how can you possibly claim any originality?
RE[3]: Patents are patents
by BallmerKnowsBest on Wed 6th Jul 2011 15:50
in reply to "RE[2]: Patents are patents"
Which is why there definitely needs to be patent reform, but the idea that software patents are totally invalid, or indeed evil :S, is ill-conceived by those who have clearly never invested significant time or money into the development of software concepts.
"I'm an expert so I don't have to back up anything I say, you should just take my word for it."
In other words you're using the oldest, most transparent, and laziest debate trick in the book. Yawn, you really need some new material.
Edited 2011-07-06 15:59 UTC
RE[2]: Patents are patents
by westlake on Wed 6th Jul 2011 05:13
in reply to "RE: Patents are patents"




Member since:
2006-10-18
Software patents act in contravention of their Constitutional purpose: to promote the useful arts. Too many mundane ideas have been patented, because someone virtualized a physical process. Simply tacking "on a mobile" or "on the internet" shouldn't meet anyone's definition of "novel" or "non-obvious".
It's not that all patents are bad. It's that there is an ocean of crap patents and a thimblefull of truly valuable ones.