To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
From the article itself: Think of decoherence as a form of noise or interference, knocking a quantum particle out of superposition — robbing it of that special property that makes it so useful. If a quantum computer relies on a quantum particle's ability to be both here and there, then decoherence is the frustrating phenomenon that causes a quantum particle to be either here or there.
As the above reply rightly quoted, decoherence is as good as unwanted observation. The article is not saying much other than "we have finally gotten rid of much of the noise. We can finally start doing something with the peace and quiet."
I don't think you are too far off quantum if you could catch that.
I won't hold my breath until they find something interesting/important. This is an important preliminary step, but not yet anywhere, really.




Member since:
2006-10-30
Sounds awesome!!! I think... But maybe some of the brighter minds can enlighten me on the difference between "decoherence", and a qubit state probability collapse into a definite state, which as far as I can remember, can happen by the mere act of observation of the said qubit...
I guess this is why I am not - and never will be - a quantum physicist... *sigh*...