To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm kind of sad that Firefox 4 got released like that, but they just had to release it. The FF4 release was just taking to much time.
I don't think there were that many user-visible changes in FF5. Which made people question the reason for the release. I think they maybe could have waited, maybe called it 4.1 release or something.
Also they want Firefox Mobile to work, obviously those devices have a lot less memory to work with. That could really help on the desktop too.
I do think it is the wrong test though.
Having a test where he would open 150 tabs, wait 10 minutes, close many, open some more wait 10 minutes and so on would be much better.
I'm on the daily builds (thus FF8) and I think having FF open all day long works better now. Also the about:memory page now shows a lot more detail.
Anyway I'm glad they are working on it now. I think the problem was, they couldn't reproduce the problems very well.
They also have a reduce-UI-latency project, can't remember the name, which I think is maybe even more important.
Atleast they are now gathering realworld numbers from real users:
http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2011/05/13/firefox-telemetry/
Hopefully that gets them the information they need.
what I'm hearing is that FF4/5 don't *leak* memory as much as their predecessors - if you open and close tabs, memory use goes up and down as you'd expect. But they do seem to be using a lot more of it than FF3 - it might not be leaking but it's still a problem on machines that don't have much to spare (like my little netbook). Sounds like that's what they're addressing at the moment...




Member since:
2008-12-09
Firefox 4 and beyond has changed their memory management from 3.5/3.6 and it started to use a lot of memory again, hence the big push they're doing now.
This push is also more important than when they analyzed memory issues and fixed them in FF 3.5/3.6 so they're going as deep as they can with it.
It seems it does pay off with more than just "memory savings" and I'm glad.