Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 18th Aug 2011 19:34 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 486036
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-01
Both HTC, LG and SE need to differentiate through software quickly. Putting a custom skin on Android won't cut it. It will still be Android, not LG or HTC experience. Samsung is already on the save bay with decent Bada market share. They have differeniated through battery life and HW price. HTC and LG will have to find some other distinct perks. (WebOS fate shows that better UI is not enough). They are feeling the breath of the Chineese tigers on their necks.
As for WP7 it looks that LG and HTC have been taken advantage of by MS forcing an immature platform to the market to stay relevant at their cost. Actually it would be fair if MS paid them for wasting production resources on such a stripped OS, not the other way around. On the other hand the number of ecosystem walled gardens is constrained by developers will to rewrite the same stuff over and over.
The irony is that so far apps have been the biggest honeypot but the real money are elsewhere.