Linked by David Adams on Thu 29th Sep 2011 23:47 UTC, submitted by lucas_maximus
Thread beginning with comment 491424
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by static666
by acobar on Fri 30th Sep 2011 17:45
in reply to "RE: Comment by static666"
Gosh, I guess you never tried digiKam did you? You now, people should first do a little research before posting.
Now, I can understand that many people love Windows, this is the platform they learned how to use computers.
There are some very nice Windows applications for sure. For example, I really miss badly Autocad on linux, but that is the ONLY application I miss.
And before I forget, I cross my fingers everyday hoping that LibreOffice will not copy the new MS Office interface
Nothing against Windows or OSX, but they aren't for me.




Member since:
2006-06-09
When comparing applications on different platforms, many people forget about whether the app is free or even open source or not. You can't be serious comparing a product of a bunch of free software developers to the one made by a horde of programmers of some software publishing house.
Well, there are exceptions, like gimp. Apart from missing a number of quite important features photo professionals use, it is an excellent app that can stand to being compared to Photoshop. And it is completely free, while Photoshop is not!
Now, if we look at photo management software, Shotwell is good and it works. Looks like Picasa, perhaps more like version 1.0 of Picasa. That's it. You can't even compare it to the latest Picasa, not even mentioning Adobe Lightroom.
Now, if there's Picasa for Linux, why isn't it on the Linux (i.e. Ubuntu) desktop by default?