Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 30th Sep 2011 20:19 UTC
Multimedia, AV So, anyone remember WebM? A reader emailed me about a pilot study (in English!) performed by a collaboration between the NPO (the Dutch version of the BBC, basically) and TNO (the largest research institution in The Netherlands, often employed by our government) into the viability of using WebM and associated tools instead of H.264 and associated tools, including the perceived quality of VP8. The outcome of the pilot shouldn't surprise anyone - the toolchain needs work, WebM itself isn't there yet, but the future looks bright.
Thread beginning with comment 491675
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Already works good here
by Neolander on Mon 3rd Oct 2011 16:54 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Already works good here"
Neolander
Member since:
2010-03-08

I still can't figure out why Flash cannot use dynamic memory allocation instead of leaving user-accessible files around the VFS. Guess that's some kind of extreme "everything is a file" Unix philosophy.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[6]: Already works good here
by zima on Fri 7th Oct 2011 04:30 in reply to "RE[5]: Already works good here"
zima Member since:
2005-07-06

The simplest, most straightforward to achieve compromise between having some caching, plus not letting the memory usage grow beyond what it already is, and code reuse between platforms?

Reply Parent Score: 2