Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 1st Nov 2011 22:58 UTC, submitted by fran
Thread beginning with comment 495309
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Exactly!!
I've never seen a screenshot of OpenBSD (or any BSD other than FreeBSD or PC-BSD, for that matter) running a full-blown DE. If it's not X-less, then it's usually a lightweight *box or tiling WM.
I've never seen a screenshot of OpenBSD (or any BSD other than FreeBSD or PC-BSD, for that matter) running a full-blown DE. If it's not X-less, then it's usually a lightweight *box or tiling WM.
Exactly what? Your comment makes zero sense. Just because you haven't seen such a screenshot doesn't mean I cannot setup my system with such a DE. Too many people make really stupid assumptions about OpenBSD as if it's not even possible to have a system setup with these bloated DE's.
If it's not X-less, then it's usually a lightweight *box or tiling WM.
One "lightweight *box" - Openbox - is, sort of, at the core of LXDE (even if this one's rather light & modular - essentially following *nix philosophy, one might say - it still shoots for DE status even via its name...)




Member since:
2008-06-03
Exactly!!
I've never seen a screenshot of OpenBSD (or any BSD other than FreeBSD or PC-BSD, for that matter) running a full-blown DE. If it's not X-less, then it's usually a lightweight *box or tiling WM.