Linked by David Adams on Wed 30th Nov 2011 20:23 UTC
Editorial A reader asks: "Can someone comment on the legality of using my brother's old Snow Leopard DVD to install OS X? My brother has Lion, so why can't he choose to give it to me? It doesn't violate Apple's 1 license per 1 computer policy."
Thread beginning with comment 498575
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: The bottom line
by Morgan on Thu 1st Dec 2011 12:19 UTC in reply to "RE: The bottom line"
Member since:

Well said. My take on it is similar: Apple doesn't necessarily like that you put OS X on your generic PC, but they're not going to waste time and money trying to stop you. It's been my experience that Hackintoshers generally tend to already own at least one Mac, and even if they don't, they might eventually get frustrated with the whole process and buy the real thing.

Apple has mostly been a hardware vendor, writing great software in order to sell their hardware for profit. They also make lots of money from iTunes, which just so happens to run on their "competitor's" OS, and probably makes them more money than iTunes users on their own OS.

It's the Psystars of the world they want to quash, as they cut into one of Apple's real money makers: Hardware sales. Why buy a $3000 Mac Pro when you can get more or less equivalent performance for $1000 and still run OS X? That scares them, and they take action at that point. Again though, they never went after the Psystar customers, just the company itself.

Edited 2011-12-01 12:21 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: The bottom line
by kurkosdr on Fri 2nd Dec 2011 09:04 in reply to "RE[2]: The bottom line"
kurkosdr Member since:

“It's the Psystars of the world they want to quash, as they cut into one of Apple's real money makers: Hardware sales.“

Correct, but just because you want something, it doesn‘t mean you have the grounds to do it. If you sell a mac clone without an OS, and in countries where the DMCA doesn‘t apply (somehow making a mac clone violates the DMCA, don‘t ask why i don‘t know), on what grounds can Apple get you? None.

Edited 2011-12-02 09:06 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: The bottom line
by Hussein on Fri 2nd Dec 2011 22:52 in reply to "RE[3]: The bottom line"
Hussein Member since:

Without Apple there would be no Mac OS. Apple sells Mac OS for less than cost. Apple is not in the business of software but hardware. Mac OS is a service. Apple used to sell it for $120 and now dropped to $30 and I won't be surprised if they make it free like iOS upgrades. Did you price the cost of a Windows license?

Reply Parent Score: 0